postimg
Aug 2010 30

The other day I went to the hair dressers for a cut.
When I arrived I asked how much? $45 they said. I said how about $25. They looked at me like I was an idiot. I pressed the point and they finally agreed. Then I said no deal as I found someone willing to do it for $10.

All in all it was a great outcome for me.

And obviously this is not true. For starters I have no hair to cut, and secondly no-one would actually do what I did.

So lets talk about a situation that actually did occur.

A photographer I know quoted to do some real estate photography. They had to drive to the location, do the shoot, go home, process the shoot, then deliver the shoot. The photographer was to provide his own transport, own camera equipment, own processing equipment, and not to mention the expertise he has developed in photography and photoshop to be able to do such work.

The photographer started with a suggested price of $150 which for the amount of work is already to cheap (if a hair dresser took half a day to cut my hair, for starters I would be pretty angry, but they would be charging a lot more than $150).

The real estate proceeded to argue the price. They agreed on $90. For half a days work.

The next day the photographer was called by the real estate agent and told they had found someone willing to do it for $50!!!

As I’m sure many of you know, this is not uncommon. There are many problems touched on in this example and these problems need to be addressed if photography is going to be an industy that generates an income for the new professionals (and old).

If you have any thoughts we would love to hear about them.

Sphere: Related Content

postimg
Aug 2010 21

Andrew Bulatowicz kindly alerted us to this upcoming event that concerns all photographers in Australia who shoot in the public arena, be it street, studio or anywhere else.

If you remember the furor that surrounded Bill Henson’s exhibition in 2008 then you will have an idea what this rally is about…

The rally has been organised by Ken Duncan for 10.00am on Sunday August 29th at Campbells Cove to raise awareness about the eroding rights of photographers in Australia.

Press Release…

14 April 2010 PHOTOGRAPHERS TO PROTEST ATTACKS ON FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION

Australian photographers are losing their rights to freedom of expression. And it doesn‟t matter whether they are full-time professional, part-time or strictly amateur, as every person who has a camera can be threatened with unjust laws and regulations.

“We must be the only country in the world where you could get a criminal record for taking a picture of a rock,” said Ken Duncan, the Chairman of Arts Freedom Australia.

“And because of this shameful situation, I am asking photographers and other concerned citizens to protest against the undemocratic regulations which now restrict film-making and photography in many of our public places,” Mr Duncan added. [..]

Sphere: Related Content

postimg
Jul 2010 21

Have you ever taken an image in a studio and found a black line down one side of it? [..]

postimg
Jul 2010 15

Moth Studios were lucky enough to be frequented by Sydney photographer Jeff Yiu before he moved to the UK in June to further pursue his career in photography. [..]

Sphere: Related Content

Apr 2010 19
By RANDY KENNEDY

The photographer Annie Leibovitz, whose protracted legal troubles had seemed to be behind her, is back in court.

Brunswick Capital Partners has filed a suit against her in New York State Supreme Court, saying that she owes the firm several hundred thousand dollars in fees for its recent role in locating investors who have helped her restructure her debt, Reuters reported.

Ms. Leibovitz fell into financial trouble, according to friends, after years of incautious spending and expensive home renovations. Last month she reached an agreement with Colony Capital, a Los Angeles firm, under which it became her only creditor and agreed to help her concentrate on her career and earnings.

She averted a foreclosure last summer after she missed a deadline to repay $24 million in loans she owed to Art Capital Group, a lender that used the rights to her photographs and her real estate as collateral.

In the new lawsuit, Brunswick Capital says that Ms. Leibovitz has failed to pay fees for its services and a 2 percent commission on the $40 million loan that Colony made to consolidate her debt. Representatives for Ms. Leibovitz and Colony Capital declined to comment, saying that they had not had a chance to review the suit. But a person with knowledge of Ms. Leibowitz’s agreement with Colony, who spoke on the condition on anonymity because she was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly, said that officials at Colony had never heard of Brunswick before becoming aware of the lawsuit.

Sphere: Related Content